| C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | Workstream | Present | Partial | Stale | Missing | In progress | Deferred to Phase II | Clean team only | Total |
| 33 | Financial & QoE | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 12 |
| 34 | Commercial & tenants | 5 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 2 | 12 |
| 35 | Leasing & development | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 3 |
| 36 | Power & technical | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
| 37 | Real estate & environmental | 3 | 4 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 8 |
| 38 | Legal & corporate | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 2 | - | 7 |
| 39 | Debt & financing | 3 | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 5 |
| 40 | Tax | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 |
| 41 | HR & management | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | 4 |
| 42 | Insurance | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 3 |
| 43 | IT & cyber | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 |
| 44 | ESG & regulatory | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 2 |
| 45 | Process | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | 2 |
| 46 | Total | 231 | 17 | 112 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 68 |
- 123 of the 68 standard requests are fully present, and 17 more partly
- 2Stale is the largest gap: posted, but cut before the last two quarter-ends
You are the associate on a buy-side team that has just been given access to the data room for Project Voltaic: the sale of 100% of Ironvale Digital Infrastructure, a US data center developer and operator, run by the banker Kingsmill & Co. The room holds 161 files in 13 folders, 35 of them in a clean-team folder your deal team cannot open. It is October 22, 2026.
Before anyone reads deeply, your job is to map the room. That means knowing what is there and how current it is, and which items on a standard due diligence request list the room cannot answer yet. This page takes that day-one review one step at a time, each step run in Compound. The answer at the end: the room covers every workstream, but its numbers stop at March 31, 2026, and the inputs that set the price rest on drafts and summaries.
A virtual data room (VDR) is the secure online site where a seller posts documents for buyers in an M&A process, usually on a platform such as Datasite, Intralinks or Ansarada. A due diligence request list, or checklist, is the buyer’s list of documents it expects to see, grouped by workstream: financial, commercial, legal, tax, HR, real estate and so on. Reviewing a data room means testing one against the other, and then asking for what is missing.
Ironvale Digital Infrastructure and Project Voltaic are fictional: the company and its data room are the open data room of PE Bench, published under CC-BY-4.0. Everything Compound produced on this page is real: the workbook and slide come from one Compound run on that room, quoted unedited apart from excerpts.
Data room index: 161 files, and how current each one is
The first step indexes every file in the room, folder by folder, and dates each one.
Compound’s Index tab gives each of the 161 files a row. This is the summary by folder.
| C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Folder | Files | Current | Aging | Stale | Historical | Superseded | Duplicates or drafts |
| 16 | 00 Clean Team | 351 | 35 | - | - | - | - | - |
| 17 | 01 Corporate | 7 | 2 | 4 | - | 1 | - | - |
| 18 | 02 Financials | 12 | 3 | - | 4 | 5 | - | - |
| 19 | 03 Portfolio & Operations | 13 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | - | - |
| 20 | 04 Leasing & Development | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | - | 1 | - |
| 21 | 05 Tenants | 8 | - | - | 72 | 1 | - | - |
| 22 | 06 Power & Infrastructure | 10 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | - | - |
| 23 | 07 Real Estate & Environmental | 30 | 29 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| 24 | 08 HR | 7 | 3 | - | 4 | - | - | 1 |
| 25 | 09 Legal | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | - | - | - |
| 26 | 10 Board Materials | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | - | 1 |
| 27 | 11 Transaction Materials | 10 | 5 | 4 | - | 1 | - | 4 |
| 28 | 12 Q&A and Supplemental Information | 4 | 3 | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| 29 | Total | 161 | 94 | 23 | 29 | 14 | 1 | 6 |
- 1Listed from the clean team protocol only. The deal team may not open folder 00, so Compound did not open it
- 2Seven of the eight tenant files are stale: the billing ledger, invoice register and concentration data stop at March 2026
More than half the files are current, but the current ones are mostly real estate reports, legal documents and the clean-team folder. The files that carry the numbers, in folders 02, 03 and 05, are mostly stale or historical.
Takeaway: the room looks full, so the question is which standard requests it actually answers.
Due diligence request list: 68 items checked against the room
The second step tests the room against a standard buy-side request list for a data center platform deal, item by item.
The Coverage tab has 68 lines in 13 workstreams. These six lines show the other statuses. The stale lines come in the next step.
| B | C | D | E | G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | # | Workstream | Standard request item | Status | What is there, and the gap |
| 7 | 1 | Financial & QoE | Audited financial statements, last three years | Partial | FY25 complete with Notes 1 to 16; FY23 and FY24 are 4-page condensed sets with selected notes only. Two FY25 versions paginate differently (17 pp vs 15 pp). |
| 13 | 7 | Financial & QoE | G&A detail by category | In progress | Requested 29-Jun-2026; still in progress at the last log update. |
| 14 | 8 | Financial & QoE | Fixed asset sub-ledger by campus and asset class | Deferred to Phase II | Deferred to Phase II. |
| 15 | 9 | Financial & QoE | Capex history and forward plan | Present | Maintenance and development capex FY23 to FY25, plan to FY30, PHX II budget and technical review. |
| 17 | 11 | Financial & QoE | Auditor management letters and control findings | Missing | Not in the room and not yet asked in Q&A. |
| 20 | 14 | Commercial & tenants | Executed leases and amendments | Clean team only | 3 wholesale leases (outside advisers only) and 10 of 140 colocation MSAs; deal team sees abstracts only. Executed leases control where summaries conflict. |
Across all 68 items, 23 are fully present and 17 are partly there. The rest are stale (11), deferred to Phase II (7), clean team only (5), still in progress (3) or simply missing (2). Each partial or stale line says what would complete it, and each one the Q&A log already covers carries the question number. The log itself was last updated on July 8, 2026: 118 questions, 18 deferred and 6 declined to the clean team.
Takeaway: only about a third of the standard requests are fully answered, and the biggest group of gaps is not missing documents but old ones.
Stale cut-offs: the numbers stop at March 31, 2026
The third step looks at the dates, because a document can be present and still be six months old.
| D | E | G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Standard request item | Status | What is there, and the gap |
| 8 | Interim financial statements, current year to date | Stale | Latest period is Q1 FY26 (31-Mar-2026). Q2 and Q3 FY26 have closed and are not in the room; the Q2 flash was promised for the second half of July 2026.1 |
| 10 | Budget, current-year reforecast and long-range plan | Stale | FY26 budget approved 11-Dec-2025 with FY27 to FY30 plan (v3.2). No reforecast after Q1 FY26. |
| 19 | Current rent roll | Stale | As of 31-Mar-2026; two quarter-ends since with no roll-forward of new leases, renewals or churn. |
| 27 | Leasing pipeline | Stale | Latest pipeline 29-May-2026. |
| 31 | Development pipeline, budget and cost to complete | Stale | PHX II and ATL II status as of 31-Mar-2026. PHX II energization (Oct 2026) and first delivery (Nov 2026) fall due now; no update in the room.2 |
| 59 | Covenant compliance certificates | Stale | Only the period to 31-Dec-2025. |
- 1Two quarters have closed since the last numbers in the room. The Q&A log shows the Q2 flash report as promised, not posted
- 2PHX II had $412M of its $618M budget spent at March 31, 2026. Its energization date has arrived with no update in the room
The latest financials are for the first quarter of FY26, to March 31, 2026. The rent roll, the billing data and the development schedule share that cut-off. Nothing newer replaces them: no reforecast, no FY26 board minutes and no covenant certificate after December 2025. A buyer pricing the business in October would be pricing it on a first-quarter view.
Takeaway: two quarters of numbers are missing, so the first request is the Q2 and Q3 FY26 financials and a rent roll at September 30, 2026.
The price inputs that rest on drafts and summaries
The fourth step checks what the documents behind the price are: final and signed, or drafts and summaries.
| D | E | G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Standard request item | Status | What is there, and the gap |
| 11 | Quality of earnings report and reliance | Partial | Sell-side QoE is a draft dated 30-May-2026; LTM subject to Q1 FY26 cut-off testing, proof of cash Q1 in progress, legal confirmations on debt-like items outstanding.1 |
| 20 | Executed leases and amendments | Clean team only | 3 wholesale leases (outside advisers only) and 10 of 140 colocation MSAs; deal team sees abstracts only. Executed leases control where summaries conflict.2 |
| 58 | Construction facility agreements (PHX II, ATL II) | Missing | Facilities drawn $420M referenced in 9.02 and the board deck; agreements not posted.3 |
- 1The draft QoE is the basis for the seller's $224.0M of FY25 adjusted EBITDA
- 2The protocol says executed leases control where the rent roll or abstracts conflict, but the deal team sees abstracts only
- 3Missing means not posted and not yet asked in the Q&A log. Change of control is an event of default under these facilities and the $1,150M term loan
Three inputs set the price, and none of them is in final form in the room:
- The quality of earnings report is a sell-side draft dated May 30, 2026. Its Q1 FY26 cut-off testing and proof of cash are open, and so are the legal confirmations on debt-like items. It supports the seller’s FY25 adjusted EBITDA of $224.0M. The buy-side work on the financial due diligence page puts it at $206.9M.
- The executed leases control wherever the rent roll disagrees with them. Only outside advisers may read the three wholesale leases, so the deal team works from abstracts. The CIM example shows what the executed leases can change.
- The construction debt is referenced but not posted. The PHX II and ATL II facilities were drawn $420M, and the only compliance certificate is for the period to December 31, 2025.
Takeaway: the earnings, the contracted term and part of the debt are all on summaries or drafts, so the final QoE, clean-team access for advisers and the facility agreements go to the top of the request list.
What to read first in the data room
The fifth step ranks the documents a deal team should open first, so the reading starts where the valuation does.
| B | C | D | E | I | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Rank | Ref | Document | Workstream | Currency |
| 7 | 1 | 11.02 | Project Voltaic CIM | Process | Current |
| 8 | 2 | 11.04 | Sell-side QoE report (draft) | Financial & QoE | Aging |
| 9 | 3 | 2.10 | FY25 audited financial statements (signed; read with 2.03) | Financial & QoE | Current |
| 10 | 4 | 3.02 | Rent roll master (31-Mar-2026) | Commercial & tenants | Stale |
| 11 | 5 | 12.01 | Buyer Q&A log (8-Jul-2026) | Process | Aging |
| 12 | 6 | 2.06 | FY26 budget and long-range plan v3.2 | Financial & QoE | Stale |
| 13 | 7 | 4.05 | Development pipeline schedule (with 4.06 PHX II budget) | Leasing & development | Stale |
| 14 | 8 | 11.06 | Technical vendor due diligence report | Power & technical | Aging |
| 15 | 9 | 9.02 | Material contract summaries | Legal & corporate | Current |
| 16 | 10 | 10.03 | Board deck, Q1 FY26 review (20-May-2026) | Financial & QoE | Aging |
The CIM comes first because every headline in the bid is anchored on it, and the draft QoE second because it bridges to adjusted EBITDA and proposes the working capital peg and debt-like items. Seven of the ten are aging or stale, which is why the reading list and the request list go out on the same day.
Takeaway: the reading order follows the valuation, and the gaps found along the way become the requests.
The first request list to the banker
The last step turns the gaps into a request list for the banker, ranked, with each line checked against the Q&A log for what has already been asked.
| B | C | E | H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | # | Priority | Request | Already asked? |
| 7 | 1 | 1 - Urgent | Q2 and Q3 FY26 financial statements (IS, BS, CF) and flash reports, plus monthly management accounts Jan to Sep 2026 | Q-021 answered; Q-101 in progress |
| 8 | 2 | 1 - Urgent | Rent roll, billing ledger, invoice register and AR aging as of 30-Sep-2026, with a bridge from 31-Mar-2026 (new leases, renewals, churn, rate changes) | Not asked |
| 9 | 3 | 1 - Urgent | FY26 reforecast or latest estimate, and any update to the FY27 to FY30 plan since v3.2 | Q-054 answered with v3.2 |
| 10 | 4 | 1 - Urgent | PHX II status pack: energization and first-delivery confirmation, latest pay application, estimate at completion, change order log, contingency, and lien settlement status; same for ATL II | Not asked |
| 11 | 5 | 1 - Urgent | Final sell-side QoE (Q1 FY26 cut-off testing done, LTM rolled to Sep-2026) and reliance letter terms for the QoE, market and technical VDD reports | Q-013 answered from the draft |
| 12 | 6 | 1 - Urgent | Clean team designations for our outside counsel and accounting advisers (Tenant Leases Tier 3, colocation MSAs and vendor agreements Tier 2, employee agreements Tier 3), and a schedule of counsel-cleared aggregated outputs | Q-068 (designation form) |
The list goes in through the room’s Q&A module, since the process letter routes every request there. The urgent requests follow the findings: the missing quarters, a rent roll at September 30, 2026, a reforecast, the PHX II status, the final QoE and clean-team designations for outside counsel and accountants. The high-priority requests behind them include the construction facility agreements, FY26 board minutes and the full RNO I ground lease, whose landlord must consent to a change of control.
Compound put the map on one slide for the deal team.

Once the room is current, the work moves on to testing it. The financial due diligence example retests the QoE against the primary records, and the CIM example ties the seller’s book to the room.
Takeaway: 23 requests go to the banker on day one, 7 of them urgent, and each says whether the Q&A log already covers it.
Data room map workbook (Excel)Compound’s workbook for Project Voltaic: the summary, the 161-file index, the 68-item coverage check, the read-first list and the request list.Download · Free, no form Data room map slide (PowerPoint)Compound’s one-page slide: coverage by workstream, the five biggest gaps and the first requests to the banker.Download · Free, no form




